Source
School of Health & Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK. tracey.howe@gcu.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
In older adults, diminished balance is associated with reduced physical functioning and an increased risk of falling. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2007.
OBJECTIVES:
To
examine the effects of exercise interventions on balance in older
people, aged 60 and over, living in the community or in institutional
care.
SEARCH METHODS:
We searched the Cochrane Bone,
Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL (The
Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 1), MEDLINE and EMBASE (to February 2011).
SELECTION CRITERIA:
Randomised
controlled studies testing the effects of exercise interventions on
balance in older people. The primary outcomes of the review were
clinical measures of balance.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:
Pairs of review authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data from studies. Data were pooled where appropriate.
MAIN RESULTS:
This
update included 94 studies (62 new) with 9,917 participants. Most
participants were women living in their own home.Most trials were judged
at unclear risk of selection bias, generally reflecting inadequate
reporting of the randomisation methods, but at high risk of performance
bias relating to lack of participant blinding, which is largely
unavoidable for these trials. Most studies only reported outcome up to
the end of the exercise programme.There were eight categories of
exercise programmes. These are listed below together with primary
measures of balance for which there was some evidence of a statistically
significant effect at the end of the exercise programme. Some trials
tested more than one type of exercise. Crucially, the evidence for each
outcome was generally from only a few of the trials for each exercise
category. 1. Gait, balance, co-ordination and functional tasks (19
studies of which 10 provided primary outcome data): Timed Up & Go
test (mean difference (MD) -0.82 s; 95% CI -1.56 to -0.08 s, 114
participants, 4 studies); walking speed (standardised mean difference
(SMD) 0.43; 95% CI 0.11 to 0.75, 156 participants, 4 studies), and the
Berg Balance Scale (MD 3.48 points; 95% CI 2.01 to 4.95 points, 145
participants, 4 studies).2. Strengthening exercise (including resistance
or power training) (21 studies of which 11 provided primary outcome
data): Timed Up & Go Test (MD -4.30 s; 95% CI -7.60 to -1.00 s, 71
participants, 3 studies); standing on one leg for as long as possible
with eyes closed (MD 1.64 s; 95% CI 0.97 to 2.31 s, 120 participants, 3
studies); and walking speed (SMD 0.25; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.46, 375
participants, 8 studies).3. 3D (3 dimensional) exercise (including Tai
Chi, qi gong, dance, yoga) (15 studies of which seven provided primary
outcome data): Timed Up & Go Test (MD -1.30 s; 95% CI -2.40 to -0.20
s, 44 participants, 1 study); standing on one leg for as long as
possible with eyes open (MD 9.60 s; 95% CI 6.64 to 12.56 s, 47
participants, 1 study), and with eyes closed (MD 2.21 s; 95% CI 0.69 to
3.73 s, 48 participants, 1 study); and the Berg Balance Scale (MD 1.06
points; 95% CI 0.37 to 1.76 points, 150 participants, 2 studies).4.
General physical activity (walking) (seven studies of which five provided primary outcome data). 5. General physical activity
(cycling) (one study which provided data for walking speed). 6.
Computerised balance training using visual feedback (two studies,
neither of which provided primary outcome data). 7. Vibration platform
used as intervention (three studies of which one provided primary
outcome data).8. Multiple exercise types (combinations of the above) (43
studies of which 29 provided data for one or more primary outcomes):
Timed Up & Go Test (MD -1.63 s; 95% CI -2.28 to -0.98 s, 635
participants, 12 studies); standing on one leg for as long as possible
with eyes open (MD 5.03 s; 95% CI 1.19 to 8.87 s, 545 participants, 9
studies), and with eyes closed ((MD 1.60 s; 95% CI -0.01 to 3.20 s, 176
participants, 2 studies); walking speed (SMD 0.04; 95% CI -0.10 to 0.17,
818 participants, 15 studies); and the Berg Balance Scale ((MD 1.84
points; 95% CI 0.71 to 2.97 points, 80 participants, 2 studies).Few
adverse events were reported but most studies did not monitor or report
adverse events.In general, the more effective programmes ran three times
a week for three months and involved dynamic exercise in standing.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS:
There
is weak evidence that some types of exercise (gait, balance,
co-ordination and functional tasks; strengthening exercise; 3D exercise
and multiple exercise types) are moderately effective, immediately post
intervention, in improving clinical balance outcomes in older people.
Such interventions are probably safe. There is either no or insufficient
evidence to draw any conclusions for general physical activity
(walking or cycling) and exercise involving computerised balance
programmes or vibration plates. Further high methodological quality
research using core outcome measures and adequate surveillance is
required.
- PMID:
- 22071817
- [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22071817
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar